Bayesian Persuasion Online Appendix
نویسنده
چکیده
1 Persuasion mechanisms In this paper we study a particular game where Sender chooses a signal π whose realization is observed by Receiver who then takes her action. In Subsection 2.3 we made an observation that Sender's gain from persuasion is weakly greater in this game than in any other communication game. In this section of the Online Appendix we provide a formal statement and proof of this claim. To do so, we introduce the notion of a persuasion mechanism. As before, Receiver has a continuous utility function u (a, ω) that depends on her action a ∈ A and the state of the world ω ∈ Ω. Sender has a continuous utility function v (a, ω) that depends on Receiver's action and the state of the world. Sender and Receiver share a prior µ 0 ∈ int (∆ (Ω)). Let a * (µ) denote the set of actions that maximize Receiver's expected utility given her belief is µ. We assume that there are at least two actions in A and that for any action a there exists a µ s.t. a * (µ) = {a}. The action space A is compact and the state space Ω is finite. We will relax the latter assumption in Section 3. A persuasion mechanism (π, c) is a combination of a signal and a message technology. Sender's private signal π consists of a finite realization space S and a family of distributions {π (·|ω)} ω∈Ω over S. A message technology c consists of a finite message space M and a family of functions c (·|s) : M → R + ; c (m|s) denotes the cost to Sender of sending message m after receiving signal realization s. 1 The assumptions that S and M are finite are without loss of generality (cf. Proposition 4) and are used solely for notational convenience. A persuasion mechanism defines a game. The timing is as follows. First, nature selects ω from Ω according to µ 0. Neither Sender nor Receiver observe nature's move. Then, Sender privately observes a realization s ∈ S from π (·|ω) and chooses a message m ∈ M. Finally, Receiver observes m and chooses an action a ∈ A. Sender's payoff is v (a, ω)−c (m|s) and Receiver's payoff is u (a, ω). We represent the Sender's and Receiver's (possibly stochastic) strategies by σ and ρ, respectively. We use µ (ω|m) to denote …
منابع مشابه
Bayesian Persuasion Online
1 Persuasion mechanisms In this paper we study a particular game where Sender chooses a signal π whose realization is observed by Receiver who then takes her action. In Subsection 2.3 we made two important observations about this game. The first observation is that, as long as Receiver knows which π Sender chose, it is not important to assume that she directly observes the realization s from π....
متن کاملSequential Bayesian Persuasion∗
This paper studies a Bayesian Persuasion model in which multiple senders sequentially persuade one Receiver. Players can always observe signaling rules of prior players and their realizations. I develop a recursive concavification method to characterize the set of SPEa. I prove the existence of a special type of equilibrium, called the Silent Equilibrium, where at most one sender designs a nont...
متن کاملBayesian Persuasion
2590 Suppose one person, call him Sender, wishes to persuade another, call her Receiver, to change her action. If Receiver is a rational Bayesian, can Sender persuade her to take an action he would prefer over the action she was originally going to take? If Receiver understands that Sender chose what information to convey with the intent of manipulating her action for his own benefit, can Sende...
متن کاملOnline Appendix for: Large Bayesian VARMAs
This appendix is divided into seven sections labelled A through G. Almost all details of the prior are specified in the paper itself, but the few remaining details about the prior are given in Appendix A. An outline of the MCMC algorithm was provided in the paper, but complete details and formulae are provided in Appendix B. Appendix C describes how we calculate the DIC which is one of the meth...
متن کاملONLINE PERSUASION AND COMPLIANCE 1 Running head: ONLINE PERSUASION AND COMPLIANCE Online Persuasion and Compliance: Social Influence on the Internet and Beyond
Petia Petrova, and Brad Sagarin for their helpful comments on this chapter.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010